2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-014-9508-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Relationships and Chromosome Evolution in Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) and Its Genomic Model, Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica)

Abstract: A switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) consensus map was developed that combined data from two mapping populations and integrated recombination data from both parents of this largely obligate outcrossing species. The consensus map consisted of 1,321 loci and spanned 2,122 cM. An analysis of the distribution of genic and genomic markers across the length of a linkage group showed that genic markers were relatively overrepresented in distal regions, while genomic markers were relatively overrepresented in pericentr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This genetic proximity was confirmed based on the consistent distribution of the markers in the genetic map ( Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 4). In addition, considering our tetraploid mapping population, the use of a tetraploid genome as reference might be more informative than the use of diploid genomes because there is a greater possibility of similar chromosomal rearrangements between these species (Daverdin et al, 2015). However, the possibility of using the genome of P. virgatum as reference does not preclude the need for a sequenced genome of M. maximus, mainly due to the possibility of identifying exclusive markers of the species, and our linkage map can contribute to the assembly of this reference genome.…”
Section: Linkage Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This genetic proximity was confirmed based on the consistent distribution of the markers in the genetic map ( Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 4). In addition, considering our tetraploid mapping population, the use of a tetraploid genome as reference might be more informative than the use of diploid genomes because there is a greater possibility of similar chromosomal rearrangements between these species (Daverdin et al, 2015). However, the possibility of using the genome of P. virgatum as reference does not preclude the need for a sequenced genome of M. maximus, mainly due to the possibility of identifying exclusive markers of the species, and our linkage map can contribute to the assembly of this reference genome.…”
Section: Linkage Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible pericentromeric region for each linkage group is suggested based on the highest marker density found within 20 cM bin sliding window. The high frequency of markers in the likely pericentromeric region of the genetic map may have lower recombination resulting in lower amount of recombination events observed (26,27,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the construction of linkage maps, the two-way pseudo-testcross mapping strategy is adopted whereby recombinations that occur at each parental side; during egg and pollen formation, are used to construct two linkage maps per chromosome (28,29). This paper describes the genotyping-bysequencing methodology and construction of two genetic maps for each population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This genetic proximity was confirmed based on the consistent distribution of the markers in the genetic map (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 4). In addition, the use of a tetraploid genome, such as that of P. virgatum, may be more informative than the use of diploid genomes, considering our tetraploid mapping population, as there is a greater possibility of similar chromosomal rearrangements between these species (Daverdin et al, 2015). It is common to find a smaller number of SNPs in linkage maps of forage grass species without an assembled genome, as observed for common millet (Panicum miliaceum) (Rajput et al, 2016) and signalgrass (Urochloa decumbens) (Ferreira et al, 2019), than in those of species with a reference genome, such as foxtail millet (Setaria italica) (Jia et al, 2017) and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) (Punnuri et al, 2016).…”
Section: Linkage Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%