2000
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-50-6-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative sequence analyses of the ribonuclease P (RNase P) RNA genes from LL-2,6-diaminopimelic acid-containing actinomycetes.

Abstract: Ribonuclease P (RNase P) RNA genes of LL-2,6-diaminopimelic acid (LL-A 2 pm)-containing actinomycetes, except Streptomyces species, were sequenced after PCR-amplification and cloning. By using the sequence data, the relationships between species within genera and the relationships between taxa above genus level were investigated and the usefulness of the RNase P RNA gene as another phylogenetic marker was evaluated. RNase P RNA gene sequences of all strains used in this study contained relatively conserved reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, rnpB-based phylogenies might be of potential interest because of the high level of variability within the coding region. Phylogenetic trees have previously been inferred successfully from the comparison of RNase P RNA sequences of various species (Cho et al, 1998 ;Herrmann et al, 1996Herrmann et al, , 2000Yoon & Park, 2000). The sequence identity between the different rnpB sequences is 74-99 %.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, rnpB-based phylogenies might be of potential interest because of the high level of variability within the coding region. Phylogenetic trees have previously been inferred successfully from the comparison of RNase P RNA sequences of various species (Cho et al, 1998 ;Herrmann et al, 1996Herrmann et al, , 2000Yoon & Park, 2000). The sequence identity between the different rnpB sequences is 74-99 %.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous comparative analyses of rnpB sequences from natural samples provided important information on the diversity of natural microbial populations (Brown et al, 1996). Sequences and structures of RNase P RNAs were suggested as distinctive markers within Saccharomonospora, the Chlamydiales and actinomycetes and allowed the inference of evolutionary relationships (Cho et al, 1998 ;Herrmann et al, 2000 ;Yoon & Park, 2000). In addition, information about the existing variants of RNase P RNAs provided clues towards the functional relevance of the different domains for the function of the catalytic core (Brown et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has found RNase P RNA to be a suitable phylogenetic marker in actinomycetes when comparing species within the same genus. There have been previous investigations using RNase P RNA for the phylogenetic analysis of actinomycetes Saccharomonospora (Cho et al 1998) and LL-2,6-diaminopimelic acid-containing actinomycetes (Yoon and Park 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third intermediate type, type C, has been observed in the green nonsulfur bacteria (Haas & Brown, 1998). RNase P RNA has proven useful for phylogenetic analysis of the Chlamydiales (Herrmann et al, 2000), Prochlorococcus (Schön et al, 2002), the LL-2,6-diaminopimelic acid-containing actinomycetes (Yoon & Park, 2000), Bartonella (Pitulle et al, 2002) and Vibrio core species (Maeda et al, 2001), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third intermediate type, type C, has been observed in the green nonsulfur bacteria (Haas & Brown, 1998). RNase P RNA has proven useful for phylogenetic analysis of the Chlamydiales (Herrmann et al, 2000), Prochlorococcus (Schön et al, 2002), the LL-2,6-diaminopimelic acid-containing actinomycetes (Yoon & Park, 2000), Bartonella (Pitulle et al, 2002) and Vibrio core species (Maeda et al, 2001), among others.The phylum Planctomycetes (Garrity et al, 2001) comprises a distinct group of the domain Bacteria on the basis of 16S rRNA analyses (Embley et al, 1994;Fuerst, 1995;Hugenholtz et al, 1998;Liesack et al, 1992;Schlesner & Stackebrandt, 1986;Woese et al, 1985). They may be one of the most deeply branching lineages within the domain Bacteria (Brochier & Philippe, 2002;Di Giulio, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%