2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative solute–discharge hysteresis analysis for an urbanized and a ‘control basin’ in the Georgia (USA) Piedmont

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, storm flow induces hysteresis in the instantaneous interaction of stream discharge and DIN and SO 4 2 exports, which leads to large errors in estimates of annual DIN and SO 4 2 exports (Takeda, 2001). The hysteresis pattern is caused by the different concentrations between rising and receding limbs of a hydrograph for DIN (Ávila et al, 1992;Evans et al, 1999;Butturini and Sabater, 2002;Zhang et al, 2007) and SO 4 2 (Ávila et al, 1992;Rose, 2003). Second, storm flow sampling is time consuming, which increases the costs related to water sampling and chemical analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, storm flow induces hysteresis in the instantaneous interaction of stream discharge and DIN and SO 4 2 exports, which leads to large errors in estimates of annual DIN and SO 4 2 exports (Takeda, 2001). The hysteresis pattern is caused by the different concentrations between rising and receding limbs of a hydrograph for DIN (Ávila et al, 1992;Evans et al, 1999;Butturini and Sabater, 2002;Zhang et al, 2007) and SO 4 2 (Ávila et al, 1992;Rose, 2003). Second, storm flow sampling is time consuming, which increases the costs related to water sampling and chemical analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water flow into and out of the hyporheic zone is influenced largely by advective exchange with the river, a process generally controlled by channel morphology, pressure head of overlying surface water, and the permeability of riverbed sediments (Landon et al 2001;Wörman et al 2002;Cardenas and Zlotnik 2003;Rose 2003). Consequently, the magnitude of river flow and the underlying geology can significantly affect chemical, physical, and biological gradients within the hyporheic zone, which ultimately will affect the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems (Stanford and Ward 1993;Curry et al 1994;Wroblicky et al 1998;Soulsby et al 2001;Alexander and Caissie 2003).…”
Section: Groundwater and Surface Water Interactions Within Fall Chinomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spawning and incubation period for the calculation of ATU was 15 November through 15 May. We had data from various sites for all three years (2001-2003Table 6.4). We assumed that hatching would occur at 500 ATU and emergence would occur at 1,000 ATU (Piper et al 1982).…”
Section: Objective 3 -Hatching and Emergence Dates Using Bed And Rivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was attributed to combined sewer overflows, including two source types: urban surface runoff [Driver and Troutman, 1989], and direct sewage sources released during event [Huber, 1993]. This is in contrast to the findings of Rose [2003] where urban surface runoff consisted of weakly concentrated waters. For the Dill catchment, the pulse of B in discharge was indicative of this first flush, and undermined the idea of continuously released sewage point sources.…”
Section: Runoff Sources Emerging In Mesoscale Catchment Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%