2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Studies of Energy Sources in Gynecologic Laparoscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, bipolar systems are deemed to be safer than monopolar systems [16]. In spite of the advanced surgical instruments attached to ESUs that enable “vessel sealing properties” in laparoscopic surgery, conventional monopolar and bipolar systems are still popular [14, 16, 20]. The majority of laparoscopists still prefer conventional monopolar and bipolar surgical tools [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, bipolar systems are deemed to be safer than monopolar systems [16]. In spite of the advanced surgical instruments attached to ESUs that enable “vessel sealing properties” in laparoscopic surgery, conventional monopolar and bipolar systems are still popular [14, 16, 20]. The majority of laparoscopists still prefer conventional monopolar and bipolar surgical tools [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study comparing the thermal effects of the Stryker (Stryker Endoscopy, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) and ERBE Erbotom VIO 300 D ESUs on uterus using conventional instruments, the ERBE Erbotom VIO 300 D unit was associated with decreased depth of injury and lateral damage in the tissue [20]. In line with the literature, our results related to the ERBE Erbotom VIO 300 D unit showed less thermal injury depth and lateral damage with the monopolar system compared with the other 2 ESUs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 The tissue impacts produced with monopolar electrosurgery incorporate vaporization (tissue destruction and cutting), fulguration (tissue destruction and little vessel hemostasis), desiccation (cell wall break and cytoplasm boiling), and coaptation (vessel sealing inferable from denaturation and renaturation of proteins) ( Table 1). 2 These tissue impacts are fundamentally accomplished by using the "cut" or "coag" mode of electrosurgical unit (ESU) while contacting or non contacting the objective tissue (Table 2). 3 Varying other parameters are under the specialist's control, such as power setting, length of enactment, and terminal arrangement, can facilitate adjusting the wanted tissue effect.…”
Section: Monopolar Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Varying other parameters are under the specialist's control, such as power setting, length of enactment, and terminal arrangement, can facilitate adjusting the wanted tissue effect. [1][2][3] All energy sources generate tissue temperatures above 45°C, the temperature at which irreversible cell damage occurs. Monopolar electrosurgery generates tissue temperatures of ~100°C, 100-200°C, and >200°C for desiccation, vaporization, and fulguration respectively.…”
Section: Monopolar Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was later modified with bipolar graspers, that allowed the energy to be more focused, diminishing surrounding tissue damage. Latter ultrasonic instruments allowed sealing larger diameter blood vessels and diminished carbonization of the adjacent tissues with no vapor to obstruct visualization, and thanks to the integrated knife a central cut was obtained [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%