“…As expected for perovskite films with a very low trap density, Q lum e and the corresponding Q lum i of the 260 (160) nm-thick MAPI film increase only slightly from a remarkable $33.8% ($30.6%) and $66.8% (61.1%) at low intensities of $0.1 Sun up to $52.2% ($46.6%) and $81.4% ($75.6%) at higher intensities of $3 Sun (see Figure S23), respectively. 11,15,30,79 Despite the very high p e , our analysis reveals that photon recycling still accounts for an impressive a PR =a tot $58% of the total emission for the 260 nm-thick MAPI film (see upper panels in Figure 3C; $52% and $32% for the 160 nm-and 80 nmthick films, respectively) which is comparable with values recently simulated for the best state-of-the-art PeLEDs. 33 In addition, our curve-fitting model also for the first time allows estimation of values for p eĂd of perovskite films, and, interestingly, it strongly increases from 6.0% G 0.5% to 17.4% G 0.7% with decreasing film thickness, which we attribute to the suppression of waveguide modes resulting in a larger fraction of direct emission.…”