2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2011.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study between bottled mineral and tap water in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentrations of the analyzed elements in water were within the range reported for tap water in Italy and did not give concerns about contamination with potentially toxic elements (Dinelli et al, 2012). The difference between analyzed elements in CTL and TE mixed feed was small except for Mo whose concentration was about 70% higher in TE mixed feed compared with CTL, likely because of Mo residues associated with the trace element premix included in the mixed feed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The concentrations of the analyzed elements in water were within the range reported for tap water in Italy and did not give concerns about contamination with potentially toxic elements (Dinelli et al, 2012). The difference between analyzed elements in CTL and TE mixed feed was small except for Mo whose concentration was about 70% higher in TE mixed feed compared with CTL, likely because of Mo residues associated with the trace element premix included in the mixed feed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Inorganic constituents and trihalomethanes in all samples were within the acceptable levels of the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines (Saleh et al, 2001). Dinelli et al investigated a large number of chemical parameters when comparing the quality of 178 mineral and 158 tap waters bottled in Italy (Dinelli et al, 2012). Recently, Astel et al presented a study of forty-seven different brands of bottled sparkling and mineral waters from Poland using hierarchical cluster analysis (Astel et al, 2014) and Felipe-Sotelo et al published a comparison of thirty seven different bottled waters from British and continental Europe using multivariate analysis (Felipe-Sotelo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sulfate concentrations of all tap water samples is below the national drinking water guideline limit of 250 mg/L and reach levels in a wide range between 10.0 and 228.8 mg/L with a median value of 46.1 mg/L (Table 3), which is clearly above the median value of European tap water with 26.9 mg/L (EGS, EuroGeoSurveys Geochemistry Expert Group, 2010) and Italian tap water with 26.8 mg/L (Dinelli et al, 2012). The tap water median value matches the sulfate concentration for water from the Miyun lake (45.2 mg/L), but is higher compared to the average value for rain water (20.7 mg/L).…”
Section: So 4 2− Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 88%