2019
DOI: 10.5958/0976-5506.2019.01698.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study between Muscle-Split Versus the Classical Muscle-Cut Subcostal Incision for Open Cholecystectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…open cholecystectomy (MC) under spinal anesthesia (SA), N=148 3 Earlier studies popularized the technology of LC and 'value for money by comparing with the conventional cholecystectomy, unlike musclesplitting MC. 28,30,34 Also, a thin physique (in the Asian population), makes access to the abdominal cavity easier via a small incision and lower wound complications. In our series, BMI was below 24.2, average 20.7 (Table 1 Selective histopathology sent in 3 (2%)--suspicious GB 2 (thick wall, ulcer, mass) and 1 patient request; 1(33.3% of 3 selective histopathologies i.e., 0.7% of total 148) revealed adenocarcinoma stage-III.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…open cholecystectomy (MC) under spinal anesthesia (SA), N=148 3 Earlier studies popularized the technology of LC and 'value for money by comparing with the conventional cholecystectomy, unlike musclesplitting MC. 28,30,34 Also, a thin physique (in the Asian population), makes access to the abdominal cavity easier via a small incision and lower wound complications. In our series, BMI was below 24.2, average 20.7 (Table 1 Selective histopathology sent in 3 (2%)--suspicious GB 2 (thick wall, ulcer, mass) and 1 patient request; 1(33.3% of 3 selective histopathologies i.e., 0.7% of total 148) revealed adenocarcinoma stage-III.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%