2018
DOI: 10.21276/aimdr.2018.4.3.pt14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Bone Marrow Aspiration and Bone Marrow Trephine Biopsy in Haematological and Non-Haematological Disorders

Abstract: Background: This study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, GMC Patiala on 100 patients over period of three years with the objective to study the comparison of the bone marrow aspiration and bone marrow trephine biopsy in haematological and non-haematological disorders in elderly age patients.(Age >50years). Methods: 100 cases with different hematological and non-hematological problems were taken up for the present study with age >50 years. Salah"s bone marrow aspiration needle and Jamshidi's bone ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of male patients in the present study were 63% and the female patients were 37% with a male to female ratio of 1.7:1. This was in concordance with the studies done by Goyal, et al [5], Panigrahi, et al [6], Khan, et al [7], Atchyuta, et al [9], and Birare, et al [10].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The number of male patients in the present study were 63% and the female patients were 37% with a male to female ratio of 1.7:1. This was in concordance with the studies done by Goyal, et al [5], Panigrahi, et al [6], Khan, et al [7], Atchyuta, et al [9], and Birare, et al [10].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The majority of cases encountered were haematological disorders accounting for 92% followed by 6% of nonhaematological disorders and 2% were normal bone marrow. These findings were in concordance with various studies by Mahajan, et al [3], Khatik, et al [4] and Goyal, et al [5]. The age range was between 9 to 2020.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation