2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of corneal tangent elastic modulus measurement using corneal indentation device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CID demonstrated very good agreement with a high prevision universal testing machine in measuring the tangent elastic modulus . Although we demonstrated good repeatability of the corneal indentation device in normal healthy corneas, additional studies are required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The CID demonstrated very good agreement with a high prevision universal testing machine in measuring the tangent elastic modulus . Although we demonstrated good repeatability of the corneal indentation device in normal healthy corneas, additional studies are required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…11 Compared with its earlier prototype, the indenter in the current study was smaller (2 mm diameter) than the prototype (5 mm diameter). Ko et al 12 validated this device using a 2 mm indenter because a bigger indenter could create eye dislocation during indentation. Potentially a smaller indenter should be more comfortable to the subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations