2021
DOI: 10.3390/jmse9070742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Different Turbulence Models for Cavitational Flows around NACA0012 Hydrofoil

Abstract: The present work focuses on the comparison of the numerical simulation of sheet/cloud cavitation with the Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes and Large Eddy Simulation(RANS and LES) methods around NACA0012 hydrofoil in water flow. Three kinds of turbulence models—SST k-ω, modified SST k-ω, and Smagorinsky’s model—were used in this paper. The unstable sheet cavity and periodic shedding of the sheet/cloud cavitation were predicted, and the simulation results, namelycavitation shape, shedding frequency, and the lift a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In CFD problems, k-ω and k-ɛ are the predominant most used turbulent models. The main difference between these valid alternatives is that the k-Epsilon model resolves the viscous layer less precisely than the k-Omega model [7]. Moreover, changing to a different turbulence model cannot rectify a poor-quality mesh, particularly if the alternative model also employs wall functions.…”
Section: Solver Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CFD problems, k-ω and k-ɛ are the predominant most used turbulent models. The main difference between these valid alternatives is that the k-Epsilon model resolves the viscous layer less precisely than the k-Omega model [7]. Moreover, changing to a different turbulence model cannot rectify a poor-quality mesh, particularly if the alternative model also employs wall functions.…”
Section: Solver Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To set up governing equations and boundary conditions for open water characteristics of the propeller, steady state simulation is used with rotating frame of reference. Governing Equations included RANS Equation with Reynolds averaging, which are expressed in [63] as;…”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model utilizes the advantages of K-omega in the near wall and the effectiveness of K-epsilon in free stream in which standard K-omega gets overly sensitive. This model is similar to the standard K-epsilon model with few refinements, which make SST model more suitable for a wider class of flows, especially those that include adverse pressure gradient as in propeller case [63].…”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows the determination of the horizontal eddy viscosity through the Smagorinsky formulation, whereas the vertical eddy viscosity is obtained from the one-dimensional k-ε model. Despite some issues when dealing with strong anisotropic or curve flows, irrotational strains, stagnation flow, and near the boundary layers flow separation points, there are several advantages to using k-ε-based models [47][48][49]. The first one concerns the isotropic eddy viscosity, a simple concept.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%