2002
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290106.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of Emdogain® and coronally advanced flap technique in the treatment of human gingival recessions

Abstract: As the additional use of Emdogain together with coronally advanced flap technique for recession coverage showed no difference in the overall clinical outcome, there is no clear benefit to combine Emdogain with this surgical technique.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
134
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
11
134
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They obtained slightly better outcomes with CPF‫ם‬EMD in terms of root coverage and clinical attachment level than with CPF, but the differences were not statistically significant. Other studies 6,7,20) involving more cases and longer follow-up periods also found no significant differences between CPF and CPF‫ם‬EMD. Meanwhile, several studies 3,5,18) have shown significantly better outcomes with CPF‫ם‬EMD than with CPF in terms of percentage of root coverage, keratinized gingival gain, and attachment gain, revealing substantial variability in the outcomes of long-term studies of CPF‫ם‬EMD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…They obtained slightly better outcomes with CPF‫ם‬EMD in terms of root coverage and clinical attachment level than with CPF, but the differences were not statistically significant. Other studies 6,7,20) involving more cases and longer follow-up periods also found no significant differences between CPF and CPF‫ם‬EMD. Meanwhile, several studies 3,5,18) have shown significantly better outcomes with CPF‫ם‬EMD than with CPF in terms of percentage of root coverage, keratinized gingival gain, and attachment gain, revealing substantial variability in the outcomes of long-term studies of CPF‫ם‬EMD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Recession coverage by coronally advanced flap procedure does not result in pocket formation but rather tissue attachment on the previously exposed root surface. 3,25,26,[31][32][33][34][35] In the present study, PD slightly increased between the 6-month and final evaluation in both groups. Thus VRD did not decrease through PD increase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The use of enamel matrix protein is one trend aiming at periodontal regeneration and root coverage. [9] The use of barrier membranes is another trend. [10]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%