2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of heavy metals content in cosmetic products of different countries marketed in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
93
13
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
93
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Faruruwa and Bartholomew reported the level of cadmium in cosmetic powders within the range of 0.1-0.5 mg/ kg, which is consistent with the present study [16]. Other studies also reported similar findings in Nigeria [3] and Pakistan [4]. However, other surveys recorded higher concentrations of cadmium in face powder cosmetics [2,17].…”
Section: Heavy Metal Levels In Face Powder Samplessupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Faruruwa and Bartholomew reported the level of cadmium in cosmetic powders within the range of 0.1-0.5 mg/ kg, which is consistent with the present study [16]. Other studies also reported similar findings in Nigeria [3] and Pakistan [4]. However, other surveys recorded higher concentrations of cadmium in face powder cosmetics [2,17].…”
Section: Heavy Metal Levels In Face Powder Samplessupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Even though lead was not detected in these cosmetics in this survey which is in agreement with the findings of other work [16], many studies in various countries investigated a wide concentration range of lead in cosmetic powder samples [2][3][4][5]18]. The levels of zinc content in these samples in this work were lower than the values obtained in other surveys.…”
Section: Heavy Metal Levels In Face Powder Samplescontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ullah [13] defined heavy metals as the generic term for metallic elements which have density five times greater than density of water, but as stated by Duffus [14], the term "heavy metals" has been given wide range of meaning by many authors, and it has never been defined by any authoritative body such as IUPAC. However, "heavy metals" is often used as a group name for metals and metalloids that have been associated with contamination and potential toxicity or ecotoxicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "heavy metals" as used in this article refers to lead, mercury, arsenic, and chromium. Lead, mercury, and arsenic are widely dispersed in environment and generally considered as the most toxic to human and animals [13]. Along with chromium, they are elements that have been associated with vehicle emissions as well repair and manufacturing activities such as painting and welding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%