2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16873-4_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Interactive Systems in a Museum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Exhibits where visitors are actively involved have been found to be very attractive [10] and are considered to be more enjoyable and worth revisiting [11]. However, one of the greatest challenges for museums is to make the technology unobtrusive for their visitors and to keep a low 'technological footprint'.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Exhibits where visitors are actively involved have been found to be very attractive [10] and are considered to be more enjoyable and worth revisiting [11]. However, one of the greatest challenges for museums is to make the technology unobtrusive for their visitors and to keep a low 'technological footprint'.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is a vast body of work within the field of AR in museum contexts, ranging from museum guides [1], [2], [3], to building virtual and augmented installations and exhibitions for the museum [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Novel technology in museums is an active and vast research area from both a technology point of view, to test new technology in a semi-controlled setting, but also from a CH point of view; considering how to best present information and knowledge to a user.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study presented a comparison between the three mentioned technologies and a traditional approach-using actual exhibited objects-for presenting information in a museum. It concluded the use of multi-touch tabletop technology surpasses all other approaches (Michael, Pelekanos, Chrysanthou, Zaharias, Hadjigavriel, & Chrysanthou, 2010).…”
Section: An Overview Of Virtual Reality Systemsmentioning
confidence: 98%