2016
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2016/754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Lrinec Score: Procalcitonin and Lrinec Score: C-Reactive Protein in Predicting Duration of Hospital Stay and Severity in Necrotising Fasciitis

Abstract: BACKGROUNDLaboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC score) is a simple laboratory tool used to distinguish between Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections (NSTI) and other soft-tissue infections. A LRINEC score of ≥6 is considered as denoting a high risk of necrotizing fasciitis. A very high LRINEC score might also be associated with mortality and other outcomes of patients with NSTI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Recognizing NSTI can be challenging, because early symptoms of NSTI, such as swelling, erythema, pain are non-specific and can occur with many different types of infections. 7 Since delay in NSTI diagnosis contributes to increased mortality, an accurate and efficient diagnosis of NSTI is imperative for successfully treating patients with NSTI. 8 In 2004, a diagnostic scoring system called the Laboratory Risk Indicators for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score was created for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Recognizing NSTI can be challenging, because early symptoms of NSTI, such as swelling, erythema, pain are non-specific and can occur with many different types of infections. 7 Since delay in NSTI diagnosis contributes to increased mortality, an accurate and efficient diagnosis of NSTI is imperative for successfully treating patients with NSTI. 8 In 2004, a diagnostic scoring system called the Laboratory Risk Indicators for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score was created for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to this, upper limb was the most common site afflicted in a study done by Wall et al This can be attributed to the fact that most of the patients in that study were IV drug abusers (71%). 15,13 Most common risk factor in present study was smoking (80%). Compared to this, the most common risk factor in the study conducted by Wall et al was intravenous drug abuse (71%) while in the study by Yi -Chun Su et al, diabetes mellitus was the commonest predisposing factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Efficiently managing NSTI begins with accurately diagnosing the condition. Identifying NSTI can pose challenges, as the initial symptoms, including swelling, redness, and pain, lack specificity and can be associated with various infection types [ 7 , 8 ]. Distinguishing an early diagnosis of NSTI from other soft tissue infections with a more favorable prognosis, such as limb cellulitis, can be a challenging task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%