2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of malathion removal from aqueous solution by agricultural and commercial adsorbents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
25
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the pH of the aqueous solution was increased from 3 to 11, the removal efficiency of the chlorpyrifos decreased from 100 to 93%. The removal rate changes of OPPs for different pH levels had a similar pattern with the trend reported in previous works (Gupta et al, 2002;Moussavi et al, 2013;Kumar et al, 2014;Naushad et al, 2014). The adsorption mechanism of OPP compounds onto the Fe 3 O 4 /red mud-NPs can be explained by electrostatic interaction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the pH of the aqueous solution was increased from 3 to 11, the removal efficiency of the chlorpyrifos decreased from 100 to 93%. The removal rate changes of OPPs for different pH levels had a similar pattern with the trend reported in previous works (Gupta et al, 2002;Moussavi et al, 2013;Kumar et al, 2014;Naushad et al, 2014). The adsorption mechanism of OPP compounds onto the Fe 3 O 4 /red mud-NPs can be explained by electrostatic interaction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Adsorption onto activated carbon is the most widely used technique for the removal of a number of toxic pollutants from water. However, due to high operation and investment costs of this technique, new inexpensive adsorbent materials have been developed in order to remove organic contaminants from water Kumar et al, 2014;Pal and Vanjara, 2001). Taha et al (2014) used untreated and treated biochars and charcoal in order to treat contaminated water with 15 different pesticides including diazinon and malathion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among these conventional methods for the removal of pesticides, adsorption technique is found to be the most economical, effective, highly flexible in design, and simple as well as offers scope for regeneration of adsorbent materials [3]. Therefore, adsorption technique has drawn wide attention of the investigators for the removal of pesticides from contaminated water samples [16][17][18][19][20]. In this perspective, intense research interest has been generated for exploring cost-effective, ecofriendly, and easily available adsorbent particularly of biological origin [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, neem bark dust (NBD) had been used effectively to remove many pollutants like Zn(II) and Cd(II) [30,31], Cr(VI) [32], As(III) [20], and dyes [33][34][35] from aqueous solutions, but no such information has been reported on the removal of carbaryl by NBD. Thus, to find the higher value of adsorption capacity compared to other adsorbents, NBD was chosen to remove carbaryl insecticide from aqueous solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%