1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0126(199805)46:1<20::aid-pi944>3.0.co;2-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of mechanical and electrical relaxations in poly(etherimide). Part 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 3 and 4 show the results of the dielectric loss in the frequency domain, at several temperatures, for LC95 without and with homeotropic alignment, respectively. The steep rise at low frequencies in Figs 3 and 4 is caused by electrical conductivity as previously proposed 18. In agreement with the Macdonald19 and Coelho20 models we consider two processes for the space charge relaxation: ohmic conduction and blocking electrodes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figures 3 and 4 show the results of the dielectric loss in the frequency domain, at several temperatures, for LC95 without and with homeotropic alignment, respectively. The steep rise at low frequencies in Figs 3 and 4 is caused by electrical conductivity as previously proposed 18. In agreement with the Macdonald19 and Coelho20 models we consider two processes for the space charge relaxation: ohmic conduction and blocking electrodes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Equation (4) assumes, from an electrical point of view, a series coupling between bulk conductivity and interfacial contributions to the loss, but does not include dipolar contributions. To take dipolar contributions into account we could assume that they are in parallel with the bulk conductivity and both in series with the interfacial phenomena; this gives us a complicated expression for the permittivity (see Díaz‐Calleja et al ,18 eqn A28). To simplify the treatment we note that at the sight of the values of the parameters appearing in Tables 3 and 4, tanh( X D )/ X D is very low in comparison with ωτ ; for this reason, interfacial contributions can be ruled out from eqn (4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also known that the loss factor of U1000 increases sharply for temperatures close to the glass transition temperature due to conductive processes [3]. In the case of thermally stimulated depolarization currents (TSDC) measurements, the relaxation of space charge is associated with the ρ relaxation, which appears at temperatures higher than the α relaxation, associated to the glass transition [4].…”
Section: Polyetherimide (Pei) Is An Amorphousmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This formalism has been successfully applied to evaluate conductivity effects in polymers like polyethylene terephthalate,21, 22 nylon‐11,23, 24 polyether imide,25 and segmented polyurethanes 26–28. However, as we will show later, this representation is very useful in our case because it allows us to discriminate between conductive and dipolar relaxation better than in other representations, based on the greater weight of the high frequencies for the modulus 19…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%