“…This may be partly the result of small or single-patient samples, or patients with bone and soft-tissue infections, endoprostheses, metal implants, or spine and pelvis changes were included in the studies. 3,5,9,19,[21][22][23][24][25] In the current retrospective study, a high sensitivity of 95% was obtained for 20 of 30 true-positive findings, in 6 of 30 true-negative findings, a relatively high specificity of 67%, and a high diagnostic 19 who reported a sensitivity of 88% and 100%, a specificity of 75%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 80%. The current study showed a false-positive result in 3 of the 30 patients.…”