2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.87.043416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of monotonically convergent optimization algorithms for the control of molecular rotation

Abstract: We apply two different monotonically convergent optimization algorithms to the control of molecular rotational dynamics by laser pulses. This example represents a quantum control problem where the interaction of the system with the external field is non-linear. We test the validity and accuracy of the two methods on the key control targets of producing molecular orientation and planar delocalization at zero temperature, and maximizing permanent alignment at non-zero temperature.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polarizability and hyperpolarizability terms lead to a non-linear interaction between the molecular system and the control field. Different optimization procedures were proposed for this kind of dynamics [196,197,198]. Other situations with isotope selectivity [199] and control by microwave pulses [200] have also been explored.…”
Section: Optimal Control For Alignment and Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polarizability and hyperpolarizability terms lead to a non-linear interaction between the molecular system and the control field. Different optimization procedures were proposed for this kind of dynamics [196,197,198]. Other situations with isotope selectivity [199] and control by microwave pulses [200] have also been explored.…”
Section: Optimal Control For Alignment and Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, provided a number of physically reasonable conditions are satisfied [65], the landscape is free of local optima, i.e., there exist one manifold of global minimum solutions (resulting in F = 0) and one manifold of global maximum solutions (resulting in F = 1), while all other critical points reside on saddle-point manifolds [62][63][64]. Such a favorable landscape topology facilitates easy optimization, as any gradient-based search (various types of which are popular in quantum optimal control [21,[66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75]) is guaranteed to reach the global maximum [76]. Unfortunately, when uncertainties are present, this landscape topology is not preserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter approach comes with the advantage of independence from the specific form of the optimization functional and matterfield interaction [14,16]. A non-linear matter-field interaction is encountered in multi-photon couplings which are important for example in the control of alignment and orientation [17,18,19]. Additional constraints in the optimization functional can be employed to keep the system dynamics within a certain subspace [20] or to restrict the bandwidth of the optimized field [21,22,23,24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%