2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of Mueller matrix transformation and polar decomposition for optical characterization of turbid media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the various decomposition approaches, different mathematical assumptions need to be made for different applications 52 – 62 , such as assuming a determined layer sequence of different fundamental polarisation components for a complex object, which in effect simplifies the matrix reciprocity problem 52 . Recently, those methods and related parameters have also been compared quantitatively with each other for the purpose of structural characterisation 170 172 . We can summarise the parameters derived via the above methods: MMPD: diattenuation (D), retardance (R) and depolarisation (Δ) (all of them maintain linear/circular components) 52 ; MMT: depolarisation (1-b), level of linear anisotropy (t 1 ), diattenuation property (t 2 ), level of birefringence (t 3 ) and fast axis orientation (x 3 ) and more 16 , 57 ; MMAC: horizontal linear anisotropy (α), 45° linear anisotropy (β) and circular anisotropy (γ) respectively with respect to the global anisotropy of the MM 56 .…”
Section: Vectorial Information Extraction Methods For Biomedical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various decomposition approaches, different mathematical assumptions need to be made for different applications 52 – 62 , such as assuming a determined layer sequence of different fundamental polarisation components for a complex object, which in effect simplifies the matrix reciprocity problem 52 . Recently, those methods and related parameters have also been compared quantitatively with each other for the purpose of structural characterisation 170 172 . We can summarise the parameters derived via the above methods: MMPD: diattenuation (D), retardance (R) and depolarisation (Δ) (all of them maintain linear/circular components) 52 ; MMT: depolarisation (1-b), level of linear anisotropy (t 1 ), diattenuation property (t 2 ), level of birefringence (t 3 ) and fast axis orientation (x 3 ) and more 16 , 57 ; MMAC: horizontal linear anisotropy (α), 45° linear anisotropy (β) and circular anisotropy (γ) respectively with respect to the global anisotropy of the MM 56 .…”
Section: Vectorial Information Extraction Methods For Biomedical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mueller matrix transformation (MMT) techniques provide a quantitative approach for characterizing the Mueller matrix elements in such a way as to evaluate specific properties of the sample, including the microstructure, density and size of the subwavelength scatterers, orientation and alignment of the fibers, presence of scatterers of various shapes and sizes, and so forth. 31,32 Various MMT parameters are available, 33 depending on the particular characteristics of interest. For example, He et al 34 proposed the following four parameters for characterizing the polarization properties of biological tissue samples:…”
Section: Mueller Matrix Transformation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the diattenuator polar form, the matter is more complicated. On the one hand, we have diattenuator polar forms proposed in [22,24]. However, in these variants of the diattenuator polar forms, there is no explicit information about the value of the linear and circular amplitude anisotropy.…”
Section: The Mueller Matrix Decompositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%