2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.09.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of NO removal in surface-plasma and volume-plasma reactors based on pulsed corona discharges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DBD can be divided into four types based on the reactor geometry: typical DBD, surface discharge, coplanar discharge, and packed-bed discharge [12]. Surface DBD (SDBD) plasma reactors (SDBDs) have aroused considerable interest because of its unique features and characteristics, for example, SDBDs are easily manufactured than other DBD reactor, and SDBDs result in a decrease in the breakdown voltages, and thus better energy efficiency is obtained [18]. Moreover, the flue gas resistance in SDBDs is much less than that in other DBD reactors due to its wider electrode gap in SDBDs when flue gas passes through DBD reactors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DBD can be divided into four types based on the reactor geometry: typical DBD, surface discharge, coplanar discharge, and packed-bed discharge [12]. Surface DBD (SDBD) plasma reactors (SDBDs) have aroused considerable interest because of its unique features and characteristics, for example, SDBDs are easily manufactured than other DBD reactor, and SDBDs result in a decrease in the breakdown voltages, and thus better energy efficiency is obtained [18]. Moreover, the flue gas resistance in SDBDs is much less than that in other DBD reactors due to its wider electrode gap in SDBDs when flue gas passes through DBD reactors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-thermal plasmas (NTPs) are regarded as promising advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for the sustainable and efficient removal of organic pollutants from wastewater (Ognier et al 2009;Hijosa-Valsero et al 2013;Iya-Sou et al 2013;Jamróz et al 2014;Magureanu et al 2015;Stratton et al 2015) and polluted gas (Ostapczuk et al 2008;Malik et al 2011;Jolibois et al 2012;Bao et al 2014;Zhang et al 2015). During the last few years, they have started to be examined for soil remediation (Wang et al 2010;Lou et al 2012;Ognier et al 2014;Aggelopoulos et al 2015a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Alternatively, although high-energy electrons can also directly destroy chemical bonds in pollutants via inelastic collisions and reduce NO x to N 2 and O 2 , 2 this process is typically negligible compared with the oxidation reactions, and NO in flue gas is eventually converted into NO 2 , NO 3 , N 2 O 5 and other high-valence oxides. 3 There are many types of NTP reactors, [4][5][6][7] of which the pulsed corona discharge plasma (PCDP) reactors have received the most attention for the treatment of gaseous pollutants not only for their high safety and high discharge efficiency 8,9 but also due to their convenience in combination with conventional SCR/SNCR processes. However, in practice, the generation of nitric acid is common for most of the NTP De-NO x processes that are primarily based on oxidation reactions of nitrogen oxide; thus, it is necessary to add secondary pollution control measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%