SAE Technical Paper Series 1993
DOI: 10.4271/933105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Restrained Child Dummies and Cadavers in Experimental Crashes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors reported that gross motion appeared to be very similar between the dummy and the child cadaver; however, significant differences in relative head/torso kinematics were observed. Brun-Cassan et al (1993) compared the response of the TNO P3 and CRABI 3-year-old with cadaver test data from Kallieris et al (1976) and noted similar limitations in the kinematic responses and dynamic data compared to the injuries observed in the cadaver tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The authors reported that gross motion appeared to be very similar between the dummy and the child cadaver; however, significant differences in relative head/torso kinematics were observed. Brun-Cassan et al (1993) compared the response of the TNO P3 and CRABI 3-year-old with cadaver test data from Kallieris et al (1976) and noted similar limitations in the kinematic responses and dynamic data compared to the injuries observed in the cadaver tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…No abdominal organ injuries were sustained. There are several other studies of full-body pediatric PMHS sled tests [126,127,130]; only one subject -a 6-year-old in a five-point child restraint harness sustained any injury to the abdominal organs (liver contusion of unknown severity). These tests are described in more detail elsewhere in this chapter.…”
Section: Post-mortem Human Subject Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the authors' knowledge, 15 pediatric whole body PMHS sled tests have been conducted to date. Subjects range in age from 2 to 13 years at speeds from 31 to 50 km/h [126][127][128][129][130]. These studies examine a diverse set of restraint conditions and the instrumentation, documentation and injury coding reflect the age in which the studies were done.…”
Section: Whole Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pediatric hub impact data were re-analyzed by Parent et al (2010) minimizing instrumentation and processing error to improve the fidelity of the data. Sled tests were performed on twelve pediatric PMHS ages 2-13 years old (Kallieris et al 1976and 1978, Mattern et al 2002, Wismans et al 1979, Dejeammes et al 1984, Brun-Cassan et al 1993. Restraints used for these pediatric PMHS tests included a lap belt with a shield booster, 4-point and 5-point harnesses, and 3-point belts.…”
Section: 22: Pediatric Pmhs Thoracic Biomechanical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summary of the pediatric PMHS and volunteer tests and their limitations are shown in Table 1.1. Kallieris et al 1976and 1978, Mattern et al 2002, Wismans et al 1979, Dejeammes et al 1984, Brun-Cassan et al 1993 *Only the older subjects had a 3-point belt restraint, younger subjects had a lap shield booster restraint.…”
Section: 27: Summary Of Limitations Of Existing Pediatric Data Andmentioning
confidence: 99%