2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Small Hydropower Turbine Efficiency at Low Head Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The references Zhou and Deng (2017) and Sritram and Suntivarakorn (2017) The initial configuration of the ultra-low head turbine is based on the work of Martin et al (2016).…”
Section: Ultra-low Head Turbine Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The references Zhou and Deng (2017) and Sritram and Suntivarakorn (2017) The initial configuration of the ultra-low head turbine is based on the work of Martin et al (2016).…”
Section: Ultra-low Head Turbine Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, the water turbine efficiency varies significantly, we assume 85% for commercial water turbines according to [15] [16]. However, other work suggested substantially lower values for small turbines, low pressure or low flow rates [17]. Using 85%, we obtain a value of 235 kW available as the shaft power.…”
Section: Energy Generation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gravitational water vortex is one form of mini/microhydro power plant that is being designed for the use of water energy with a very low head. Research on free vortex turbines is capable of producing a maximum mechanical efficiency of 35.92%, which is far higher than traditional water wheels, which only produce a maximum mechanical efficiency of 13.69% (Sritram and Suntivarakorn, 2017;Nishi and Inagaki, 2017). Previous research has shown that there are many factors that affect the efficiency of the free water vortex turbine, such as vortex pool design, configuration of the turbine and material, and changes in flow rate parameters (Power et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%