2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of surrogate approaches while optimizing computationally expensive reaction networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is believed that to be more cost-effective 47 and superior to represent nonlinear relationships. 48,49…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method is believed that to be more cost-effective 47 and superior to represent nonlinear relationships. 48,49…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is believed that to be more cost-effective 47 and superior to represent nonlinear relationships. 48,49 Figures 5-7 illustrate the three-dimensional (3D) graph showing the influence of the process parameters (v c , f z , a p , and H) on the response parameters (R a , P c , and T c ) when the Kriging model were applied. These 3D graphs are the visual tool that are used to observe the relationship between inputs and outputs as well as to analyze the trend of outputs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, over recent decades, novel modeling techniques have been developed which can substantially aid the optimization of process systems. For instance, surrogate models such as Kriging [39][40][41][42][43][44], radial basis functions [45][46][47][48][49][50], artificial neural networks [51][52][53][54][55][56], splines [57,58], among others were shown to accurately represent complex physical systems while aiding optimal search algorithms. No literature exists which explores the application of such techniques to advance the study of CHP dispatch.…”
Section: Optimal Combined Heat and Power Dispatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though when compared with SRM models or conventional polynomials these regression model has found to be better than that. Kriging model developed in geostatic in South Africa is also being used to define the relationship between different process parameters and machining responses in EDM, and it has been found to be better than both SRM and ANN when highly nonlinear characteristic and efficiency in cost [15] of experimentation is considered though Kringing model may require more points to capture non-linear behaviour [16,17]. When optimizing the process parameters, it helps an EDM operator to get the most optimum machining outputs for a required purpose.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%