2010
DOI: 10.1021/jf104060h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of the Main Top-down Approaches for the Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty in Multiresidue Analysis of Pesticides in Fruits and Vegetables

Abstract: Practical "top-down" approaches appear to be the most suitable for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty in pesticide residue testing laboratories, where analytical procedures are routinely applied to a large number of pesticide/food combinations. The opposite approach, "bottom-up" evaluation of measurement uncertainty, leads to great difficulties in evaluating all of the pesticides in a consistent way. Among the top-down approaches, there are two main ways in which measurement uncertainty can be estimated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the RSD of the PT was used to estimate U r of the individual methods which successfully participated in PT schemes. The mean RSD of EU-based PT studies for pesticides in fruit and vegetables has ranged at approximately 25% [35, 36]. Therefore the EU member states have adopted a default value of U r  = 50% for pesticide residues in food consignment entering the EU [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the RSD of the PT was used to estimate U r of the individual methods which successfully participated in PT schemes. The mean RSD of EU-based PT studies for pesticides in fruit and vegetables has ranged at approximately 25% [35, 36]. Therefore the EU member states have adopted a default value of U r  = 50% for pesticide residues in food consignment entering the EU [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expanded measurement of uncertainties was estimated by applying a “top-down” empirical model (coverage factor k  = 2) at a 95% confidence level (Medina-Pastor et al 2011). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method uncertainty (U) for metazachlor and clomazone was calculated following the "top-down" approach using overall recovery and precision data 29,39 , reaching 6-26% (16% on average) for metazachlor and 7-16% (11% on average) for clomazone (coverage factor k = 2, confidence level of 95%). These values are much below the limit value of 50%, recommended by European Union guidelines 35 .…”
Section: Modification and Validation Of Clomazone And Metazachlor Metmentioning
confidence: 99%