2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-1440-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study on the effects of meteorological and pollutant parameters on ANN modelling for prediction of SO2

Abstract: Variations in meteorological parameters, different transportation mechanisms, complex reaction mechanisms and insufficient control measures have made control of ambient air pollution, a challenge. Prediction mechanisms for pollutant concentrations in advance have become necessary to regulate parameters within the acceptable limits. Artificial neural network (ANN) modelling can be used for predicting the concentrations of pollutants by establishing functional relationships between complex and nonlinear predicto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research was used, as input, daily values of air temperature, humidity, www.nature.com/scientificreports/ The findings for each five air pollutants highlighted that neural network models to be significantly superior compared to MLR owing to their ability to effectively predict the complex and nonlinear issues such as air pollution 42 . Although implementation of regression methods is simple, however, the results of various studies also exhibit that regression methods may not offer precise predictions in some areas such as air pollution in comparison to ANNs models; and ANNs have generally superior performance 39,43,44 .The comprehensive data collection including green space and traffic data is the most advantages of our study. As a result, our ANN model is more accurate than other developed models in research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This research was used, as input, daily values of air temperature, humidity, www.nature.com/scientificreports/ The findings for each five air pollutants highlighted that neural network models to be significantly superior compared to MLR owing to their ability to effectively predict the complex and nonlinear issues such as air pollution 42 . Although implementation of regression methods is simple, however, the results of various studies also exhibit that regression methods may not offer precise predictions in some areas such as air pollution in comparison to ANNs models; and ANNs have generally superior performance 39,43,44 .The comprehensive data collection including green space and traffic data is the most advantages of our study. As a result, our ANN model is more accurate than other developed models in research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…SO2, NOx, NH3, CO, particulate matter, T, RF (rainfall), RH, WD, WV (wind velocity) were used as inputs. Their model showed good quality evaluation characteristics with an MSE of 0.0115 and an R of 0.8979 [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlation analysis is used in [42] to select input variables for a CNN-LSTM model predicting the PM 2.5 concentrations. In [24], the authors examine both backward elimination and forward selection to choose the input variables, and the obtained results show that the models that utilize techniques to optimize the used input data perform better than those using all variables. Moreover, the backward elimination technique gives better results than the forward selection.…”
Section: Selection Of Input Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are simpler, lighter, and easier to implement, and when enough historical data are provided, statistical models show better forecast results for specific locations. Popular statistical models for predicting the air quality include artificial neural networks [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], multiple linear regression [25], autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) [26], support vector machine (SVM) [27], nonlinear regression [28] and random forest [29]. Neural networks (NN) are a popular choice for air pollution forecasting, since they do not require any prior assumptions about the data distribution, and are capable of modeling complex nonlinear processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%