2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0147-6513(02)00073-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative toxicity of Chlorothalonil: Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, based on the environmental fate properties of chlorothalonil, exposures are likely to be acute (short-term), so survival/mortality is another potential endpoint of concern. Both fecundity and survival endpoints were addressed in the present study, with no significant effects on either, even though the maximum exposure concentration was 15.5 µg/L, from a wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC © 2019 The Authors pulsed exposure that averaged 14.1 µg/L over 20 h. This compares to a reported 48-h LC50 for chlorothalonil to fathead minnow of 22.9 µg/L (Sherrard et al 2003) and a LOEC from a fathead minnow fish full-life cycle study of 3 µg/L, based on fecundity (European Commission 2016). What is clear is that, in the present study, all pulsed concentrations tested were far in excess of the fish chronic RAC of 0.14 µg/L used in the initial risk assessment in European Union (fish full-life cycle NOEC of 1.4 μg/L divided by an assessment factor of 10) and produced no significant adverse effects on fish fecundity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…However, based on the environmental fate properties of chlorothalonil, exposures are likely to be acute (short-term), so survival/mortality is another potential endpoint of concern. Both fecundity and survival endpoints were addressed in the present study, with no significant effects on either, even though the maximum exposure concentration was 15.5 µg/L, from a wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC © 2019 The Authors pulsed exposure that averaged 14.1 µg/L over 20 h. This compares to a reported 48-h LC50 for chlorothalonil to fathead minnow of 22.9 µg/L (Sherrard et al 2003) and a LOEC from a fathead minnow fish full-life cycle study of 3 µg/L, based on fecundity (European Commission 2016). What is clear is that, in the present study, all pulsed concentrations tested were far in excess of the fish chronic RAC of 0.14 µg/L used in the initial risk assessment in European Union (fish full-life cycle NOEC of 1.4 μg/L divided by an assessment factor of 10) and produced no significant adverse effects on fish fecundity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Toxicity to adults was intermediate with a LC 50 = 152.9 μg L -1 (Key et al, 2003). Sherrard et al (2003) reported LC 0 , lowest observable eff ects concentration, LC 50 , and LC 100 values for 7-d exposure of Pimephales promelas of 14.4, 15, 22.6, and 30.8 μg L -1 , respec-tively. Th e same values for Ceriodaphnia dubia were 103, 125, 156, and 210 μg L -1 , respectively (Sherrard et al, 2003).…”
Section: Chlorothalonil Eventmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The fungicidal activity exhibited by chlorothalonil is attributed to the inactivation of cell sulfhydryl enzymes (Vincent and Sisler 1968;Sherrard et al 2003). Gallagher et al (1992) recorded a depletion of glutathione, resulting in the inhibition of glucose oxidation in exposed channel catfish.…”
Section: Mode Of Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%