2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07972-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative transcriptional profiling of tildipirosin-resistant and sensitive Haemophilus parasuis

Abstract: Numerous studies have been conducted to examine the molecular mechanism of Haemophilus parasuis resistance to antibiotic, but rarely to tildipirosin. In the current study, transcriptional profiling was applied to analyse the variation in gene expression of JS0135 and tildipirosin-resistant JS32. The growth curves showed that JS32 had a higher growth rate but fewer bacteria than JS0135. The cell membranes of JS32 and a resistant clinical isolate (HB32) were observed to be smoother than those of JS0135. From the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cumulative counts for MIC data, with the exception of one resistant strain with an MIC of 256 μg/ml, were performed to match a suitably shaped normal distribution (normality test, P > 0.200) using SigmaStat and GraphPad Prism software (Figure 3 ). Furthermore, the strain whose MIC was 256 μg/ml had been proved as resistant one, with a resistant HAPS_RS04930 reported by Zhixin Lei [ 49 , 50 ]. The optimum MIC range from 0.002 to 32 μg/ml was obtained from non-linear regression (Table 1 ), and the range was further corrected to 0.032 to 32 μg/ml according to the optimum distribution determined using the NORMINV function in Microsoft Excel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cumulative counts for MIC data, with the exception of one resistant strain with an MIC of 256 μg/ml, were performed to match a suitably shaped normal distribution (normality test, P > 0.200) using SigmaStat and GraphPad Prism software (Figure 3 ). Furthermore, the strain whose MIC was 256 μg/ml had been proved as resistant one, with a resistant HAPS_RS04930 reported by Zhixin Lei [ 49 , 50 ]. The optimum MIC range from 0.002 to 32 μg/ml was obtained from non-linear regression (Table 1 ), and the range was further corrected to 0.032 to 32 μg/ml according to the optimum distribution determined using the NORMINV function in Microsoft Excel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high MIC value (256 μg/ml) may be explained by cross-resistance of macrolides, exposure to precursors of tildipirosin (tylosin and tilmicosin) or misuse of tildipirosin. The resistance mechanism of HPS to tildipirosin or other macrolides may be associated with the pathways of amino acid ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter system (HAPS_2069, HAPS_RS03630) and the metabolite transporter superfamily (HAPS_2067 and HAPS_2068, HAPS_RS08950) [ 49 , 50 , 55 , 56 ], which will be a focus of future studies. Hence, all HPS isolates (163) except one (256 μg/ml) tested in this study could be considered as a WT isolates for ECV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Monte Carlo simulation to predict dosage for clinical use had the advantage of taking into account the PK‐PD parameters based on bacteriological outcome. Furthermore, it could set target percentages such as 90% and 50% for simulation models for all data in relation to incidence in pigs (Dorey et al., ; Lei et al., ). As a matter of fact, the products containing dox as an active ingredient must have the posology regimen (dose and length of treatment) on the label in a general against all pathogenic bacteria not specifically for H. parasuis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haemophilus parasuis is a Gram‐negative opportunistic pathogen of pigs mainly responsible for pneumonia, and causing considerable economic losses to the pig industry worldwide (Lei et al., ; Yang et al., ). The resistant H. parasuis has been reported in Switzerland, the UK, and Spain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three subtypes of type I receptor and type III receptor. The TGFβ signaling pathway includes three subtypes of type I, type II and type III receptor 23 . TGFβ1, TGFβ2 and TGFβ3 are very similar in most biological functions, but they may differ greatly in some aspects.…”
Section: -5p Chi-mir-125b-3p Chi-mir-21-5p Chi-mir-143-5p Chi-mmentioning
confidence: 99%