2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00197-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative use of faecal egg count reduction test, egg hatch assay and beta-tubulin codon 200 genotyping in small strongyles (cyathostominae) before and after benzimidazole treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar to those observed by Varady et al (1995), although other authors have obtained less conclusive results (Craven et al 1999;Samson-Himmelstjerna et al 2002). All of these, together with the fact that EHA is a cheaper and faster method than FECRT, make EHA an ideal technique for routine diagnosis or following-up AR against benzimidazoles in field studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results are similar to those observed by Varady et al (1995), although other authors have obtained less conclusive results (Craven et al 1999;Samson-Himmelstjerna et al 2002). All of these, together with the fact that EHA is a cheaper and faster method than FECRT, make EHA an ideal technique for routine diagnosis or following-up AR against benzimidazoles in field studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The usefulness of the EHT for field testing is supported by data demonstrating agreement between results obtained by this in vitro method with those of the most frequently applied in vivo test. The EC 50 results obtained with the EHT have been compared with the fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT; Craven et al 1999;Johansen and Waller 1989;von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al 2002b), the larval development test (Craven et al 1999;Várady and Čorba 1999;Königová et al 2003), and the tubulin-binding assay (Johansen and Waller 1989). In field trials, the majority of FECRTs positive for benzimidazole resistance were also positive using the EHT (Várady et al 2006;Maingi et al 1998;Wirtherle et al 2004); however, the results did not correlate well in all studies published (Craven et al 1999;Maingi et al 1998;Königová et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 50 reports have been published using the EHT for the detection of either BZ or levamisole resistance in trichostrongylid nematodes of sheep and goats (e.g., Boersema et al 1987;Dobson et al 1986;Ghisi et al 2006;Hoekstra et al 1997;Hunt and Taylor 1989;Johansen and Waller 1989;Martin et al 1989;Várady et al 2006), cattle (e.g., Borgsteede et al 1992;Jackson et al 1987), horses (e.g., Ullrich et al 1988;Ihler and Bjorn 1996;von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al 2002b;Várady et al 2000;Whitlock et al 1980;Wirtherle et al 2004), pigs (e.g., Várady et al 1996), and humans (e.g., DeClerq et al 1997;Albonico et al 2005). However, to date no standardized EHT protocol for which data on the repeatability of data generated within laboratories and reproducibility of results between laboratories has been published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One report suggested that the mutation at codon 200, which is associated with BZ resistance in ruminant nematodes, may not be responsible for BZ resistance in cyathostomins [55]. PCR was used to assess allele frequencies in single larvae (pre-and 66 days post-treatment), in susceptible and resistant BZ populations [56]. A general trend toward higher percentages of phe/tyr and tyr/tyr individuals was observed following treatment, however no statistically significant difference was found between these two genotypes and the phe/phe genotype percentages [56].…”
Section: Cyathostomin Anthelmintic Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR was used to assess allele frequencies in single larvae (pre-and 66 days post-treatment), in susceptible and resistant BZ populations [56]. A general trend toward higher percentages of phe/tyr and tyr/tyr individuals was observed following treatment, however no statistically significant difference was found between these two genotypes and the phe/phe genotype percentages [56]. However, a positive correlation was observed between the faecal egg count reduction test results and the phe/phe percentages.…”
Section: Cyathostomin Anthelmintic Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%