2010 22nd IEEE International Conference on Tools With Artificial Intelligence 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ictai.2010.91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Approaches to Preference Dominance for Conversational Recommenders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of our experiments on three different data sets have shown that the finite user profiles set assumption has a strong effect on the process of computing the best query revisions compared to the infinite models described and analyzed in [4,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of our experiments on three different data sets have shown that the finite user profiles set assumption has a strong effect on the process of computing the best query revisions compared to the infinite models described and analyzed in [4,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommending personalized query revisions by inferring constraints on the user utility function by observing the user selection was first proposed in [4] and extended in [11]. This approach was proved to be effective: it was shown that good query suggestions were provided, and the final product recommendations were also optimal.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A basic problem is: given a set of outcomes, determine which are the undominated ones, i.e., which are not considered worse than another outcome. For example, in a recommender system, one can use preference deduction techniques to infer, from the previous user inputs, which products may be preferred over others, and hence which are the undominated ones [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%