2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing automated text classification methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
139
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
139
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They are trained on single datasets by using various algorithms. The recent review articles analysing state-of-the-art classification algorithms [23,62,72] report that methods, such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Decision Tree (DT), are the most frequently applied to text classification. Therefore, in the experiments, we took into account these algorithms.…”
Section: Appendix B: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are trained on single datasets by using various algorithms. The recent review articles analysing state-of-the-art classification algorithms [23,62,72] report that methods, such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Decision Tree (DT), are the most frequently applied to text classification. Therefore, in the experiments, we took into account these algorithms.…”
Section: Appendix B: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the computer science perspective, the LIWC‐approach is based on an algorithm that might not capture the range of information that machine learning programs could be trained to do. It is worth noting that LIWC is a user‐friendly program (Hartmann, Huppertz, Schamp, & Heitmann, 2019; Pollach, 2012), particularly for researchers who want to conduct language analysis but cannot write codes in other programming languages, such as Python, Ruby, and C++.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unstructured data can often be accessed directly through an application programming interface (API) from social media platforms, scraped manually from webpages, or internally from firm-owned marketing communications, such as image and video advertisements and corresponding meta-data. Although the multi-terabyte scale data makes human coding unfeasible, interest among marketing researchers in classifying large amounts of unstructured data and linking it to marketing outcomes continues to grow (Hartmann, Huppertz, Schamp, & Heitmann, 2019). Fortunately, automated procedures for gathering unstructured data are becoming more accessible.…”
Section: Gather and Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%