2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing connectomes across subjects and populations at different scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it was found that weighted metrics are less affected by the application of different thresholds (TD and Tc) as low weights have lower influence. Therefore, although the choice of an unbiased weighting scheme that represents true connectivity remains an open issue in brain structural networks analysis (IturriaMedina et al, 2007;Jbabdi and Johansen-Berg, 2011;Meskaldji et al, 2013), weighted measures may have the advantage of not requiring setting thresholds.…”
Section: Effects Of a Common Density Threshold On Repeatabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it was found that weighted metrics are less affected by the application of different thresholds (TD and Tc) as low weights have lower influence. Therefore, although the choice of an unbiased weighting scheme that represents true connectivity remains an open issue in brain structural networks analysis (IturriaMedina et al, 2007;Jbabdi and Johansen-Berg, 2011;Meskaldji et al, 2013), weighted measures may have the advantage of not requiring setting thresholds.…”
Section: Effects Of a Common Density Threshold On Repeatabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the imaging measures of connectivity can be used to model the brain as a network, it is worth to locally compare populations not only cell by cell of the connectivity matrices, but also by estimating the network measures that characterize the topological properties of the brain network (Fornito et al, 2013;Meskaldji et al, 2013a;Bassett et al, 2008). The combination of the local and the global inferences gives a better understanding of the network organization (Meskaldji et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Local Network-based Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the multiplicity of tests is ignored, the risk of committing false discoveries increases. As a consequence, erroneous conclusions are frequently drawn (Meskaldji et al, 2013a). On the other hand, considering multiplicity could dramatically decrease the chance of detecting real between-group effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the choice of these values is somehow arbitrary but it permits to highlight the influence of thresholding on the inference. For more discussion see [9].…”
Section: Description Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, prior information about the dependence structure between tests could be available in some situations. In recent work, we developed two-step procedures that exploit the data structure and prior information of positive dependence between tests [7,8,9,1]. The proposed procedures work as the following.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%