2022
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.886841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Convolutional Neural Network and Machine Learning Models in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in Wenchuan County

Abstract: Landslides are one of the most widespread disasters and threaten people’s lives and properties in many areas worldwide. Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) plays a crucial role in the evaluation and extenuation of risk. To date, a large number of machine learning approaches have been applied to LSM. Of late, a high-level convolutional neural network (CNN) has been applied with the intention of raising the forecast precision of LSM. The primary contribution of the research was to present a model which was ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To sum up the results, the proposed TSDNN model is more advantageous in processing data having dynamic features. The LSM results were reclassified by the natural breakpoint method in QGIS software, and the proportion of each susceptibility class to the overall area [41], [42] was calculated (Fig. 15).…”
Section: Lsm Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sum up the results, the proposed TSDNN model is more advantageous in processing data having dynamic features. The LSM results were reclassified by the natural breakpoint method in QGIS software, and the proportion of each susceptibility class to the overall area [41], [42] was calculated (Fig. 15).…”
Section: Lsm Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VIF computes the extent of correlation between an independent factor and other factors in a model, and it is interpreted as VIF = 1 means factors are not correlated, VIF between 1 and 5 means factors are moderately correlated, and VIF >5 indicates high correlation among the factors. TOL is the reciprocal of VIF, and its values are between 0 and 1 (Chen and Chen, 2021;Jaydhar et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022). VIF and TOL are computed using the following functions: Triggering factor Rainfall Uncertain 0ཞ60, 60ཞ80, 80ཞ100, 100ཞ110, 110ཞ120, 120 mm above…”
Section: Multicollinearity Analysis Of Landslide Conditioning Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, most of the susceptibility maps were produced based on an expert's judgment which consumes a lot of time and energy, and it is difficult to quantify its accuracy due to its subjective effects. Fortunately, with the development of computer technologies such as Geographic Information Systems, Remote Sensing, and advanced data collection methods, machine learning algorithms are widely used in this field (Chowdhuri et al, 2021a;Ganga et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022). These developments have significantly improved LSM accuracy and efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a landslide inventory map was constructed with 100 landslide locations identified using the combined findings of previous studies, the interpretation of Google Earth images, and fieldwork validation. According to Zhang et al (2022), there are no specific rules for choosing landslide characteristics. Thus, based on analysis of the landslide inventory map and the underlying geomorphometric conditions, eight physical characteristics, including roads and highways, stream network, DEM, slope angle, slope aspect, curvature, land use, and lithology were selected as landslide physical factors (Table 1).…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%