1984
DOI: 10.1080/01944368408976579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Costs of Alternative Flood Hazard Mitigation Plans The Case of Soldiers Grove, Wisconsin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In theory, then, home buyouts mitigate against future hazards by reducing the number of households at risk and increasing the amount of natural mitigation in place. These programs have been in use in the U.S. since the late 1970s, beginning with the relocation of flooded homes and businesses in Soldiers Grove, WI (David & Mayer, 1984;Tobin & Peacock, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, then, home buyouts mitigate against future hazards by reducing the number of households at risk and increasing the amount of natural mitigation in place. These programs have been in use in the U.S. since the late 1970s, beginning with the relocation of flooded homes and businesses in Soldiers Grove, WI (David & Mayer, 1984;Tobin & Peacock, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 1961, the Army Corps of Engineers began planning for a dam upstream, first estimated to cost $15.4 million, which rose eventually to >$55 million (Tobin and Peacock, 1982). In tandem with the dam, the Corps proposed a $3.5 million levee system to protect downtown Soldiers Grove, triple the value of structures protected (David and Mayer, 1984). Although most floodplain residents in most places press for structural projection regardless of the cost, Soldiers Grove rejected the Corps' levee proposal because of the disproportionate cost, the residual risk of failure, local levee maintenance costs after construction, and disconnection from the river (Kilian, 1975).…”
Section: Soldiers Grove Wisconsinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9(p8) When Soldiers Grove, Wisconsin, relocated its business district away from the Kickapoo River, the town decided to relocate in a way that would reinvigorate the economy and stem population loss or even stimulate growth. [32][33][34] Residents chose a location that was not only safer from floods but closer to the local highway to encourage economic growth; they relocated the town well to avoid contamination from floodwaters; and they created a regulation to promote solar power in the new district-forward thinking in 1979. [32][33][34] New businesses arrived, the town's economy and population grew, and Soldiers Grove became known as Solar Town.…”
Section: Why Manage Retreat?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34] Residents chose a location that was not only safer from floods but closer to the local highway to encourage economic growth; they relocated the town well to avoid contamination from floodwaters; and they created a regulation to promote solar power in the new district-forward thinking in 1979. [32][33][34] New businesses arrived, the town's economy and population grew, and Soldiers Grove became known as Solar Town. Moving was not just about fleeing floods; it was about breathing new life.…”
Section: Why Manage Retreat?mentioning
confidence: 99%