2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-04175-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing CW-GMAW in direct current electrode positive (DCEP) and direct current electrode negative (DCEN)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several alternatives for raising the efficiency of GMAW process, such as using direct current electrode negative (DCEN) operation, extended electrical stick out, high operating current, or a combination of these effects [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Operating GMAW with DCEN can increase the burn off rate of the wire by up to 50%, but the electric arc behaves erratically [ 9 ]. The extension of electrical stick out will enhance the deposition rate due to the increased resistive heating of the wire, but this may affect the protection effect of the shielding gas [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several alternatives for raising the efficiency of GMAW process, such as using direct current electrode negative (DCEN) operation, extended electrical stick out, high operating current, or a combination of these effects [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Operating GMAW with DCEN can increase the burn off rate of the wire by up to 50%, but the electric arc behaves erratically [ 9 ]. The extension of electrical stick out will enhance the deposition rate due to the increased resistive heating of the wire, but this may affect the protection effect of the shielding gas [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noticed that because of the location where the WFS is measured (before the main drive roller assembly) the advance and retreat movements performed by the secondary drive roller (in the torch) are not perceived in the results, as such movements are accommodated in the buffer of the CMT process. As the fusion capacity in GMA processes is higher when in the negative polarity time, as in this case the arc climbs the electrode-wire in the search for oxides for Figure 4 Number of short-circuits in each semi-cycle (EP and EN) and total number of short-circuits in a full cycle for the entire spectrum of the EP/EN parameter cathodic emission (Li et al, 2018;Assunção et al, 2019;Souza et al, 2010) and boosts its heating, the CMT advanced process compensates that by making the current contribution (directly proportional to its intensity) to the melting rate as being relatively smaller during the EN semi-cycles than it is in the EP semi-cycles, as seen in Figure 5. Therefore, it was found that, despite the current levels being lower during the EN semicycles, the melting rate of the wire remains the same all the way through and the WFS level can be kept constant.…”
Section: Cold Metal Transfer Advanced Process Working Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%