Comparing cybersickness in virtual reality and mixed reality head-mounted displays

Abstract

Introduction: Defence Research and Development Canada is developing guidance on the use of Mixed Reality head-mounted displays for naval operations in the Royal Canadian Navy. Virtual reality head-mounted displays display graphics to the user in 3D and completely occlude the user’s view of the real world. Mixed Reality head-mounted displays overlay and integrate graphics onto the real world allowing the user to perceive the real world and rich 3D graphic elements simultaneously. Nausea and other debilitating symptoms caused by the use of head-mounted displays, known as ‘cybersickness’, is well documented during Virtual reality head-mounted display exposure and can be quite severe. However, it is not yet clear from the literature on Mixed Reality head-mounted displays whether CS differs in Virtual reality vs. Mixed Reality head-mounted displays. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of Virtual reality head-mounted displays on CS.Method: This was done by modulating the quantity of graphics in two Mixed Reality conditions and one Virtual reality condition. Only foreground objects were graphically rendered in the first Mixed Reality condition (called ‘Mixed Reality’ condition), while the entire scene was graphically rendered in the second Mixed Reality condition (called ‘Mixed Reality +’ condition). The Virtual reality condition simulated the Mixed Reality + condition but was displayed in a Virtual reality head-mounted display. Participants observed the virtually rendered scene in one of the three conditions and reported their CS with the simulator sickness questionnaire six times throughout the 30-min experiment. We hypothesized that CS severity would increase as quantity of graphics in the display increased.Results and Discussion: Findings indicated that CS was significantly greater in the ‘Mixed Reality +’ condition compared to the ‘Mixed Reality’ and ‘Virtual reality’ conditions, providing partial evidence for our main hypothesis. Moreover, CS increased significantly and meaningfully after 25 min in the ‘Mixed Reality +’ condition. These findings indicate safe use of Mixed Reality head-mounted displays by the RCN for shore-based applications provided quantity of graphics is limited.

Motion Sickness in Mixed-Reality Situational Awareness System

“…A recent scholarly publication authored by Rolos and Merchant presents a methodical examination of the distinct vulnerability patterns observed in VR and MR HMDs [26]. It is postulated that the decrease in cybersickness induced by MR can be attributed to the translucent characteristics of MR HMDs, which allow for partial visibility of the real world and facilitate visual-vestibular interactions that enhance congruence.…”

Influence of a Three-Month Mixed Reality Training on Gait Speed and Cognitive Functions in Adults with Intellectual Disability: A Pilot Study

“…However, in MR they are overlaid on the real physical environment by means of an adapted head-mounted device (i.e., HoloLens ® , Microsoft, One ® , Magic Leap) ( Figure 1 ). Hence, in a MR environment such as Microsoft HoloLens ® provides, the user perceives more visual information from the real physical environment than in VR, which reduces sensory conflict and therefore cybersickness [ 24 ]. Thus, MR seems suitable for rehabilitation purposes.…”

Development of a Human–Robot Interface for Cobot Trajectory Planning Using Mixed Reality

“…This aspect is crucial here, as it fully integrates the physical and digital environments. This creates a unique environment where digital objects can interact coherently with the user and the physical environment around them [11,12]. MR differs from AR by adding virtual elements to physical reality and manipulating the user's physical sensations directly [13].…”