2022
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Efficacy and Safety in Catheter Ablation Strategies for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract: Although catheter ablation (CA) is an established treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), there is no consensus regarding the most efficient CA strategy. The objective of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies for PAF. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL until the final search date, 5 October 2020. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing different CA strategies and methods for pulmonary vein isolat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, mechanisms other than PVs’ firing have been hypothesized for AF initiation and maintenance in these settings. Although meta-analyses suggest a potential incremental benefit in terms of procedural efficacy for extra-PVI lesions in patients with persistent AF [ 63 , 64 ], no conclusive evidence has been provided to date. Furthermore, in 2014, a meta-regression analysis reported no differences in sinus rhythm maintenance between the PVI-only approach and extended left atrial ablation in patients with AF and HFrEF [ 65 ].…”
Section: Catheter Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, mechanisms other than PVs’ firing have been hypothesized for AF initiation and maintenance in these settings. Although meta-analyses suggest a potential incremental benefit in terms of procedural efficacy for extra-PVI lesions in patients with persistent AF [ 63 , 64 ], no conclusive evidence has been provided to date. Furthermore, in 2014, a meta-regression analysis reported no differences in sinus rhythm maintenance between the PVI-only approach and extended left atrial ablation in patients with AF and HFrEF [ 65 ].…”
Section: Catheter Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AF also confers a 3-fold enhanced risk for congestive cardiac failure as well as a 2-fold enhanced risk for dementia or demise [ 1 ]. Over the last decades, tremendous advancement has been achieved in the radical treatment of AF, especially in percutaneous catheter ablation procedures and cardiac Cox maze surgeries, which successfully restore the sinus rhythm in most AF patients [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. However, the recurrence events of AF subsequent to catheter-based ablation or cardiac surgical therapy remain a major clinical challenge [ 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ], irrespective of the decreasing but formidable periprocedural complications, encompassing pulmonary vein stenosis, systemic thromboembolism, esophageal injury, atrial-esophageal fistula, and cardiac perforation/tamponade [ 50 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequent sites receiving additional CA are left atrial appendage, superior vena cava, sites showing high AF complexity, low voltage areas and areas with high dominant frequency (DF) [10,18]. Nevertheless, the effect of creating additional lesions in the atria is under dispute for some studies [10,43,82].…”
Section: Af Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%