2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing forecasting approaches for Internet traffic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of these auto-encoder ANNs have been demonstrated in temperature prediction [28], weather forecasting [29], prediction of traffic flows [30] or prediction of power consumption in a data centre [31]. The comparison presented in [13] shows that FARIMA processes and ANNs have similar approximation errors. However, the best results are achieved for hybrid solutions which employ both FARIMA and ANNs simultaneously [13,32,33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effectiveness of these auto-encoder ANNs have been demonstrated in temperature prediction [28], weather forecasting [29], prediction of traffic flows [30] or prediction of power consumption in a data centre [31]. The comparison presented in [13] shows that FARIMA processes and ANNs have similar approximation errors. However, the best results are achieved for hybrid solutions which employ both FARIMA and ANNs simultaneously [13,32,33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The comparison presented in [13] shows that FARIMA processes and ANNs have similar approximation errors. However, the best results are achieved for hybrid solutions which employ both FARIMA and ANNs simultaneously [13,32,33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, unlike linear ARIMA and FARIMA, ANNs can handle also non-linear phenomena in time series [26,27]. Thus, ANNs have been also widely applied for network traffic modelling and prediction [28,29].…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies different processing steps: management of a track record with the data required to build forecasting models, analysis of the data characteristics which are relevant for deciding the best suited prediction algorithms, construction of forecasting models, decision of prediction algorithms, forecasting and evaluation of the results in order to learn from the previous decisions. Note that as stated in [47], the prediction of network events enhances the optimization of resources, allows the deployment of proactive actions and anticipates risk identification. The SELFNET Analyzer focuses primarily on infer predictions from two data structures: time series and graphs.…”
Section: Analyzer Module Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%