2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00281.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing How Students Collaborate to Learn About the Self and Relationships in a Real-Time Non-Turn-Taking Online and Turn-Taking Face-to-Face Environment

Abstract: A matched study compares collaborative learning about the self and relationships in two different learning environments. One environment is a traditional university classroom in which participants take turns expressing themselves. The other is online, using the LBD eClassroom©, which allows several participants to express themselves at the same time. The intent was to migrate the content and the process of the course from a traditional face‐to‐face classroom to an online classroom. By eliminating the constrain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey about interaction of scene experience concludes that students prefer unencumbered communication with classmates which the original offline classroom interaction support. The same conclusion from study of Lobel [11], comparing online and offline interactive collaboration environment of students, indicates that group interaction rate of students is higher than the students in the interaction between the teacher ratio, the survey of McCarthy [12] indicates that students tend to group interaction and peer interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The survey about interaction of scene experience concludes that students prefer unencumbered communication with classmates which the original offline classroom interaction support. The same conclusion from study of Lobel [11], comparing online and offline interactive collaboration environment of students, indicates that group interaction rate of students is higher than the students in the interaction between the teacher ratio, the survey of McCarthy [12] indicates that students tend to group interaction and peer interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…A csetszövegek számos olyan beszélt nyelvi elemmel rendelkeznek, amelyek lehetővé teszik, hogy az írásbeli megnyilatkozásokat a szóbeliekhez hasonlóan elemezzük (Keszy-Harmath 2018). A szinkrón írásbeli osztálytermi diskurzus jellemzője, hogy megnő a tanulói aktivitás a kontaktórához képest: több különböző diák nyilatkozik meg az írásos csatornán, és ugyanannyi idő alatt összességében több hozzászólás születik (Lobel et al 2005). A tanulói aktivitás növekedésének oka, hogy az ilyen típusú felületek interaktívak, azonnali válaszlehetőséget biztosítanak, a beszélők kiválasztása pedig önkijelölés alapján történik (Lapadat 2002), míg a kontakt osztályteremben a tanárnál van az alapvető beszédjog (Király 2015).…”
Section: Bevezetésunclassified
“…Examples of studies addressing these issues are in Lobel et al (2005) and Stanton and Stanton (2017).…”
Section: Interaction In and Beyond Ictenhanced Face-to-face Classroommentioning
confidence: 99%