Comparing Integrated and Disciplinary Clinical Training Patterns for Dental Interns: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Effect on Students’ Self‐Confidence

Abstract

In China, the five-year program of undergraduate education for stomatology consists of four years of lecture courses and one year of internship focused on clinical training. Dental schools provide this clinical training either in their own clinics (referred to as the one-stage pattern because all forms of practice are completed together) or by placing students in external clinics usually at non-affiliated hospitals (referred to as the three-stage program because the three primary areas are taught separately). The aims of this study were to investigate differences in teaching effect between the one-stage and the three-stage patterns and to evaluate advantages and disadvantages of the two patterns. A three-section, 31-item questionnaire was designed to assess basic and clinic information about the interns' training and their self-confidence in performing clinical procedures. The survey was administered to graduates who finished the fifth-year internship in 2012-14. Of the 356 individuals invited to participate, 303 graduates who spent their intern years in 43 academic dental institutions returned completed surveys (response rate of 85%). The one-stage group (n=121) reported longer independent operation time than the three-stage group (n=182) (p<0.01). No significant difference was found between the groups for assessment of clinic infrastructure (p=0.121). The interns were most confident in oral hygiene instruction and scale and polish (overall median=5), but showed low confidence in rubber dam placement and four other procedures (overall median=2). The one-stage group rated their confidence level higher than the three-stage group on comprehensive skills such as arranging appointments and managing patients and procedures needing long treatment periods such as molar endodontics. The three-stage group showed higher confidence on more specialized procedures such as surgical extractions and suturing. This study found that both of the two intern patterns had advantages and shortcomings in clinical training in various procedures. Combining the two could be a way to improve clinical education in China.Dr. Wu is a Master's student,

Self‐reported confidence and anxiety over endodontic procedures in undergraduate students—Quantitative and qualitative study

“…When the students were at more advanced stages in the course, the difference in anxiety mentioned above would not have been significant. Similar results were found in other studies in which it became clear that practice and repetition are essential elements for the students to gain confidence …”

“…As reported by the authors, students from universities with integrated clinics were more independent and felt safer to deal with unexpected circumstances whereas students from universities with non‐integrated clinical curricula showed greater ease in the conduction of specialised procedures. The authors suggested that the best form of curriculum would be one that blends these two forms …”

Dental Student Perspectives of a Comprehensive-Based Teaching Methodology: A Confidence, Effectiveness, and Challenge Report

“…Furthermore, trends such as outreach teaching experiences and community dental care have proven to be useful adjuncts to meet the increasing demand for well-trained graduates [ 6 ]. All these new educational systems have shown to enhance achievement, acquisition of knowledge, and student professional development [ 7 – 9 ].…”

“…From one view, it enables students to look upon the greater image of treating patients and not to focus on one precise problem. Furthermore, patients' needs are met, and health care is provided in a proper sequential manner which is not applicable when a “student-centered approach” is practiced [ 9 – 11 ].…”

Students' perspectives and views toward a comprehensive based model of teaching: Confidence, effectiveness and challenges

“…Furthermore, trends such as outreach teaching experiences and community dental care have proved to be a useful adjunct to meet the increasing demand for well-trained graduates [6]. All these new educational systems have shown to enhance achievement, acquisition of knowledge, and student professional development [7,8,9].…”