2020
DOI: 10.1080/23324309.2020.1822870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Kinetic and MEP Model of Charge Transport in Graphene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation has shown that the model describes qualitatively the macroscopic behavior of the charge transport and is able to differentiate the graphene ribbons from the graphene sheets. Moreover the obtained results are comparable with that ones obtained by solving numerically the Boltzmann equation [22,23,25,26] but with a remarkable reduction of the computational time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation has shown that the model describes qualitatively the macroscopic behavior of the charge transport and is able to differentiate the graphene ribbons from the graphene sheets. Moreover the obtained results are comparable with that ones obtained by solving numerically the Boltzmann equation [22,23,25,26] but with a remarkable reduction of the computational time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The comparison between linear and non-linear models can be found in [24]. A comparison between both models and numerical solutions of the kinetic equations is presented in [25].…”
Section: Closure Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are compared with the corresponding splitting algorithm, showing an excellent agreement as well as a low-cost computational effort. Future research will develop this MC methodology for the simulation of realistic devices, such as silicon nanowires according to the guidelines in [14,15] and new emerging materials such as graphene [8,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%