2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing methods for calculating channel steepness index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Digital Elevation Model (SRTM DEM, pixel size of 90 m) was used to perform the topographic and the river network analysis described above. All steps were conducted using ArcGIS tools, TopoToolbox (Schwanghart & Scherler, 2014), TAK (Forte & Whipple, 2019) and a series of MATLAB functions (Gallen & Wegmann, 2017; Goren et al., 2014; Smith et al., 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Digital Elevation Model (SRTM DEM, pixel size of 90 m) was used to perform the topographic and the river network analysis described above. All steps were conducted using ArcGIS tools, TopoToolbox (Schwanghart & Scherler, 2014), TAK (Forte & Whipple, 2019) and a series of MATLAB functions (Gallen & Wegmann, 2017; Goren et al., 2014; Smith et al., 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was extended by Fox and Carter (2020) and Smith et al. (2022) to account for spatial variability in surface uplift. The basis of this approach is that a discrete version of the stream power model can be written using a series of nodes along the main trunk river: ziB.L.=j=1i)(normalΔχjuj+S.U.i ${z}_{i}-B.L.=\sum\limits _{j=1}^{i}\left({\Delta }{\chi }_{j}\right){u}_{j}^{\ast }+{S.U.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations