2007
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpm012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing model-based approaches with bucking simulation-based approach in the prediction of timber assortment recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assortment volumes of harvested trees were calculated with the taper models of Laasasenaho [42]. Quality deductions were made on saw log volume, based on the models of Mehtätalo [43] and the results of Malinen et al [44]. The deduction was implemented by moving a part of saw log volume into pulpwood assortment.…”
Section: Use Of the Monsu Planning Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assortment volumes of harvested trees were calculated with the taper models of Laasasenaho [42]. Quality deductions were made on saw log volume, based on the models of Mehtätalo [43] and the results of Malinen et al [44]. The deduction was implemented by moving a part of saw log volume into pulpwood assortment.…”
Section: Use Of the Monsu Planning Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose was to transfer a part of log volume to pulpwood volume due to defects which are present but not taken into account in the taper models. The predictions of Mehtätalo's models were multiplied with correction factors which were 0.7 for pine, 0.4 for spruce, and 1.2 for birch (Malinen et al 2007). This is because it has been noticed (Malinen et al 2007) that Mehtätalo's models overestimate the reduction in pine and spruce, and underestimate it in birch.…”
Section: Yield Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adjusted cutting patterns left little wastage in the top section of the taper trees in the simulations but kept any waste section that was cut from the lower stem of their most similar trees. In doing so, the simulated cutting patterns remained the most realistic, unlike some CTL and bucking-to-value simulations that used modelled taper curves (Malinen et al 2007). In the final data set generated by the CTL simulations, SEDOB TL ranged from 3.9 to 20.4 cm with a median of 12.1 cm and the minimum total log length was 4.2 m, while the length of the top section varied from 1.2 to 14.0 m, with a median of 5.9 m, but the length of 90% of the top sections was between 3.0 and 8.8 m.…”
Section: Cut-to-length (Ctl) Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%