2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.66.165307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing pseudopotential predictions for InAs/GaSb superlattices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. The PL emission peak positions are in good agreement with recent accurate pseudopotential calculations on symmetrical InAs (N)/GaSb(N) type-II SL structure [16] giving a theoretical fundamental transition around 230 meV for a layer thickness N of 10 MLs. We can notice a PL peak shift from 245 meV (no InSb layer) to 215 meV (1.5 ML InSb thickness).…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5. The PL emission peak positions are in good agreement with recent accurate pseudopotential calculations on symmetrical InAs (N)/GaSb(N) type-II SL structure [16] giving a theoretical fundamental transition around 230 meV for a layer thickness N of 10 MLs. We can notice a PL peak shift from 245 meV (no InSb layer) to 215 meV (1.5 ML InSb thickness).…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For that reason, the fundamental electron-hole transition between the lowest-lying conduction C 1 and heavy-hole HH 1 subbands is controlled by the choice of the binary layer thicknesses. Symmetrical InAs (N)/GaSb (N) SL, where the SL's period is composed by equal number N of InAs and GaSb monolayers (MLs), can theoretically exhibit MWIR interband absorption, from 3 to 6 mm, for N values between 5 (15 Å ) and 12 MLs (36 Å ), respectively [16]. However, the major advantage of the type-III band profile is the possibility to reduce the Auger recombination rate by eliminating some nonradiative pathways between valence bands [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graph also shows the theoretical wavelength tuning curve calculated by a superlattice pseudopotential model ͑SEPM͒. [2][3][4] When the InAs electron quantum well thickness is set to its minimum value of 1 ML ͑Ϸ3 Å͒, the resulting low wavelength limit is near 2.5 m. Interestingly, if the electron well is completely eliminated ͑i.e., −0 ML InAs͒, the emission wavelength of the resulting epitaxy falls to ϳ2.3 m.…”
Section: Sponsoring / Monitoring Agency Name(s) and Address(es) 10 Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 An arguably more realistic potential ͑although not all would agree 20 ͒ is provided by the atomic superposition model, which is defined as a linear combination of screened atomic pseudopotentials. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Here, the atomic potentials are assumed to be known as continuous functions of k; 29 hence, no interpolation is required.…”
Section: Previous Descriptions Of the Interface Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest is the planar interface model, in which the potential is assumed to make an abrupt transition from one periodic bulk potential to another at some predefined interface plane. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] This requires as input only the bulk pseudopotential form factors.…”
Section: Previous Descriptions Of the Interface Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%