2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.88.165119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing quasiparticleGW+DMFT and LDA+DMFT for the test bed material SrVO3

Abstract: We have implemented the GW +dynamical mean field theory (DMFT) approach in the Vienna ab initio simulation package. Employing the interaction values obtained from the locally unscreened random phase approximation (RPA), we compare GW +DMFT and LDA+DMFT against each other and against experiment for SrVO3. We observed a partial compensation of stronger electronic correlations due to the reduced GW bandwidth and weaker correlations due to a larger screening of the RPA interaction, so that the obtained spectra are… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
67
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the difference in occupation already discussed, also the position of the lower Hubbard band is shifted upwards by 0.5 eV in the surface layer; its weight and sharpness are enhanced. This effect might actually explain the disagreement between photoemission spectroscopy (PES) and DFT+DMFT [17,42] regarding the position of the lower Hubbard band. As PES is surface sensitive, the surface layer will contribute strongly to the PES signal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the difference in occupation already discussed, also the position of the lower Hubbard band is shifted upwards by 0.5 eV in the surface layer; its weight and sharpness are enhanced. This effect might actually explain the disagreement between photoemission spectroscopy (PES) and DFT+DMFT [17,42] regarding the position of the lower Hubbard band. As PES is surface sensitive, the surface layer will contribute strongly to the PES signal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first implementations of GW+DMFT have recently been elaborated, with applications to SrVO 3 [17,18] and to systems of adatoms on surfaces [19]. Nevertheless, since the approach is computationally heavy, an important line of research remains the developing and testing of approx-(a) E-mail: vanroeke@cpht.polytechnique.fr (b) E-mail: biermann@cpht.polytechnique.fr imate schemes, and several different simplified schemes [20][21][22] have recently appeared.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this GW + EDMFT formalism has been tested on simple one-band Hubbard models [14][15][16][17], and several simplified versions have been applied to SrVO 3 [7,10,18,19], a fully self-consistent implementation in an ab initio setting has so far been hampered by the challenges of solving the bosonic selfconsistency loop for multiorbital systems and nontrivial issues related to a proper embedding of the EDMFT calculations into a GW ab initio framework.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5]). Comparable values for the "Hubbard U " on the order of 5 eV were obtained by constrained local density approximation (LDA) [6,7] and used in DMFT calculations with static local interactions. The constrained random phase approximation (cRPA) [8] provides a systematic way of computing the dynamically screened interaction parameters consistent with the LDA band structure, and the resulting local U (Ļ‰) of the DMFT auxiliary system can be efficiently handled by state-of-the-art impurity solvers [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%