2006
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing real‐world advantages for the clinical neuroradiologist between a high field (3 T), a phased array (1.5 T) vs. a single‐channel 1.5‐T MR system

Abstract: Purpose:To evaluate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and neuroradiologists' subjective assessments of image quality in 3-Tesla (3-T) or phased-array MR systems that are now available for clinical neuroimaging. Materials and Methods:Brain MR images of six normal volunteers were obtained on each of three scanners: a 1.5-T single-channel system, a 12-channel, phased-array system, and a 3-T single-channel system. Additionally, clinically optimized images acquired from 28 patients who underwent imaging in more than one … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We focused on elderly patients and noticed a higher incidence of HARM in our population compared with the result obtained by Latour et al [20,22]. Partially, this may be explained by the use of 3-T MRI with a higher resolution [31,32], but the higher incidence of HARM could also be due to a higher vulnerability of the BBB in older patients. Stroke severity and WML were not associated with HARM.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…We focused on elderly patients and noticed a higher incidence of HARM in our population compared with the result obtained by Latour et al [20,22]. Partially, this may be explained by the use of 3-T MRI with a higher resolution [31,32], but the higher incidence of HARM could also be due to a higher vulnerability of the BBB in older patients. Stroke severity and WML were not associated with HARM.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…The 25 patients (15 male) had a median age of 21 years (range 13-50) at surgery. The median (interquartile range) (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) months. FCD2 was located in the frontal lobe in 22 cases (including nine in the central region and one in the insula), 2 lesions were parietal, and one was in the temporal lobe, with 12 lesions in the right hemisphere and 13 in the left hemisphere.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 Yet, this improvement might not solely be due to the increase in field strength but rather to the use of phased array coils. [13][14][15] The benefit of 3T MRI, if any, is likely not identical for all types of epileptic lesions. Hippocampal sclerosis and tissue loss are reported to be best seen at 1.5T, 14,16 whereas cortical development lesions, including FCDs, would be best seen at 3T.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9] The advent of clinical MR imaging at 3.0T and better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and higher resolution promise to further improve detection of brain metastases. [10][11][12][13] However, changing from 1.5 to 3.0T lengthens T1 relaxation time of brain tissue, thereby decreasing the contrast between gray (GM) and white matter (WM) 14 in T1-weighted images and the capacity to discriminate cerebral anatomy. 15 A related issue is that speciˆc absorption rate (SAR) at 3.0T is 4 times higher than at 1.5T.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%