Comparing seismicity declustering techniques by means of the joint use of Allan Factor and Morisita index

Abstract

In this paper, we propose to compare different declustering methods on the basis of the time-correlation and the space-clustering of the residual earthquake catalog after the declustering techniques have been applied. To this aim, we applied two point process clustering measures, the Allan Factor and the Morisita Index, for the identification and quantification of temporal correlation and spatial clustering in point processes, respectively. We used our joint space-time approach to study the earthquake spacetime point processes of southern California and Switzerland with surrounding area, declustered by using the method of Gardner and Knopoff (with Grünthal and Uhmhammer window) and that of Reasenberg (with different setting parameters). Our results show that the residual declustered catalog is still characterized by timecorrelated structures at long timescales; however, the cutoff timescale that is the lowest timescale above which the time-correlation is visible is higher with the Reasenberg method while is smaller with the Gardner and Knopoff method with Grünthal window. The space-clustering analysis performed by means of the Morisita Index suggests that the declustering technique effectively reduces the spatial clustering of the seismicity of Switzerland, but does not change the spatial properties of the residual seismic catalogue of the southern California.

Prospective and retrospective evaluation of five-year earthquake forecast models for California

“…However, they underpredicted the number of earthquakes during the 40YEAR.RETRO experiment, when their forecasted spatial seismicity rate distributions were also inconsistent with observed seismicity. One possible reason for the underprediction is the difference in declustering algorithms applied to the earthquake input data and observation catalogue (Gardner and Knopoff for USGS models and Reasenberg for RELM models), as the Gardner and Knopoff method tends to remove more earthquakes than the Reasenberg method (Telesca et al 2016). Because the forecasts rejected in favour of UCERF2 during the 40YEAR.RETRO experiment only included southern California, the failed S-test may indicate that incorrect seismicity rates of the USGS models were confined mainly to central and northern California.…”

Comprehensive Earthquake Catalogs and Seismicity Parameters from Incomplete Earthquake Catalogs of Guilan Region, Iran

“…Gruenthal [49], Reasenberg [50] and Uhrhammer [51] presented the same method with different values for time and space windows. Amini (2014) and Telesca et al (2016) compared different declustering approaches from the points of viewing time and space correlation to achieve Poissonian catalogs and assess performance of each approach [52,53]. Table 7.…”

2D Anisotropic Wavelet Entropy with an Application to Earthquakes in Chile

“…A typical example of oriented point patterns is given by the distribution of earthquake epicenters after a "mainshock" event. "Aftershock" events are normally clustered along the linear directions or segments given by the active faults [53].…”