Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2982142.2982157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Tactile, Auditory, and Visual Assembly Error-Feedback for Workers with Cognitive Impairments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kosch et al [47] developed a context-aware, stationary projector for assembly scenarios that would give error feedback through different modalities to compare whether visual, auditory or haptic feedback would be the best suited modality for cognitively impaired workers. A study with 16 cognitively impaired participants revealed the visual approach to be the fastest, which also resulted in the least errors made.…”
Section: Projectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kosch et al [47] developed a context-aware, stationary projector for assembly scenarios that would give error feedback through different modalities to compare whether visual, auditory or haptic feedback would be the best suited modality for cognitively impaired workers. A study with 16 cognitively impaired participants revealed the visual approach to be the fastest, which also resulted in the least errors made.…”
Section: Projectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has also concerned notifying persons about events, such as warning of dangers or sending reminders. Kosch et al [30,31] investigated how events of interest can be communicated efficiently with cognitively impaired persons within workplaces. By comparing visual, auditory, and tactile feedback, their findings show that visual in-situ cues are perceived efficiently.…”
Section: Accessibility Through Assistive Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multimodal actuations are generally offering a more natural and trusted perception as long as the provided sensations are corresponding to plausible procedures [8,9]. But various studies also revealed that a combination of a primary and a supporting feedback dimension is often more effective than a combination of three or more feedback dimensions [8,9,10,11,12].…”
Section: Feedback Modalities and Feedback Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%