2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2014.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the accuracy of multivariate density forecasts in selected regions of the copula support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Giot and Laurent (2003) showed that a model with skew t innovations outperforms those with symmetric distributions in VaR estimation; Huang et al (2015) suggested that better portfolio performance is achieved with a time-varying copula, particularly the Clayton copula. Diks et al (2010) and Diks et al (2014) found that for daily exchange rate returns, the t copula is favored over its counterparts, while in the government bond market, a mixture of t and Clayton copulas performs best for the daily changes of yields on government bonds of the G7 countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Giot and Laurent (2003) showed that a model with skew t innovations outperforms those with symmetric distributions in VaR estimation; Huang et al (2015) suggested that better portfolio performance is achieved with a time-varying copula, particularly the Clayton copula. Diks et al (2010) and Diks et al (2014) found that for daily exchange rate returns, the t copula is favored over its counterparts, while in the government bond market, a mixture of t and Clayton copulas performs best for the daily changes of yields on government bonds of the G7 countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This underlines that we are really comparing the forecasting quality of the copula part. Second, we focus the evaluation on the joint lower region of the copula support by using the conditional likelihood (cl) scoring rule proposed by Diks et al (2014),…”
Section: Multivariate Density Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is however important and non-trivial, with an ongoing strand of research on copula selection and goodness-of-fit testing (see, e.g., Diks, Panchenko, and van Dijk (2010) and Diks et al (2014) that optimizes copula choice using out-of-sample forecasting criterion) and we refer the reader to these related literature.…”
Section: Copula Choicementioning
confidence: 99%