2015
DOI: 10.4018/ijaeis.2015100105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the MLC and JavaNNS Approaches in Classifying Multi-Temporal LANDSAT Satellite Imagery over an Ephemeral River Area

Abstract: This paper analyzes two pixel-based classification approaches to support the analysis of land cover transformations based on multitemporal LANDSAT sensor data covering a time space of about 24 years. The research activity presented in this paper was carried out using Lama San Giorgio (Bari, Italy) catchment area as a study case, being this area prone to flooding as proved by its geological and hydrological characteristics and by the significant number of floods occurred in the past. Land cover classes were def… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the opportunity to achieve long-term time series through the use of Landsat data, in orbit since 1972, renouncing the higher spatial resolution provided by the newest generation satellites that would not allow historical evaluations of similar time periods [27,28]; 2. the possibility to provide national agencies and local authorities with a low-cost dataset.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the opportunity to achieve long-term time series through the use of Landsat data, in orbit since 1972, renouncing the higher spatial resolution provided by the newest generation satellites that would not allow historical evaluations of similar time periods [27,28]; 2. the possibility to provide national agencies and local authorities with a low-cost dataset.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LULC information can be obtained from the multiband raster imageries through the process of image interpretation and classification (Li et al 2014). Image classification (supervised or unsupervised) is intended for an automatic categorisation of pixels with a common reflectance range into specific LULC class (Lillesand and Kiefer 1994;Chica-Olmo and Abarca-Hernandez 2000;Tarantino et al 2015). Supervised classification is a user guided approach that involves selection of training sites as reference for the categorization (Campbell 1996;Lillesand and Kiefer 1994;Jensen 2007).…”
Section: Land Use and Land Cover Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum-likelihood classifier was adopted from a parametric classification algorithm [27][28][29][30] and divided into four classes: urban, vegetation, forest and waterbodies ( Table 2). The classes that were involved in the selection of the training sites were used as a reference in the user-guided approach [17,[31][32][33][34]. For each of the predetermined change detection types, training samples were selected by delimiting the polygons in the study area.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring and analysis for change detection is the most adopted application of the satellite data [13][14][15]. Among them, Landsat satellite datasets have been used for change detection analysis [11,14,16,17]. Change detection analysis can enhance the land-use planning within a framework of laws and policies to guide forest zone allocation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%