2018
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the reproducibility of commonly used magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques to quantify cerebral glutathione

Abstract: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
39
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
39
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this fact, the findings of this study indicate moderate to strong reliability of GSH measures in the DLPFC and M1 using the unedited MP‐off and SP methods, thus suggesting that conventional, unedited measures of GSH may have good precision. This finding is supported by a recent study which found good test–retest reproducibility for short echo‐time MRS measures of GSH . Correlations for the MP‐diff measures of GSH were generally poor, suggesting that quantification of the co‐edited GSH signal in GABA‐editing experiments is not reliable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite this fact, the findings of this study indicate moderate to strong reliability of GSH measures in the DLPFC and M1 using the unedited MP‐off and SP methods, thus suggesting that conventional, unedited measures of GSH may have good precision. This finding is supported by a recent study which found good test–retest reproducibility for short echo‐time MRS measures of GSH . Correlations for the MP‐diff measures of GSH were generally poor, suggesting that quantification of the co‐edited GSH signal in GABA‐editing experiments is not reliable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This finding is supported by a recent study which found good test-retest reproducibility for short echo-time MRS measures of GSH. 45 Correlations for the MP-diff measures of GSH were generally poor, suggesting that quantification of the co-edited GSH signal in GABA-editing experiments is not reliable. Nonetheless, all three methods tested tended to be in agreement that GSH levels were higher in the DLPFC than in M1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GGT expression is accordingly higher in cancer, including in high-grade primary glioblastoma, and non-invasive analysis of GGT activity, therefore, is associated with tumor antioxidant levels. Here we quantified GSH ex vivo, however prior work has used optimized 1 H MRS sequences to separate GSH from the overlapping glutamate and glutamine peaks and assess steady-state GSH levels in patients in vivo [52][53][54] . Consistent with our preclinical findings, these studies showed that in brain tumors GSH levels were higher than in normal-appearing brain 55,56 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy with H 1 -MRS quantifies various cerebral metabolites in vivo (Wiebenga et al 2014) and has been utilized in the evaluation of a variety of diseases including neurodegenerative (Alzheimer's disease; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), psychiatric diseases (schizophrenia; depression) (Wijtenburg et al 2019), and brain trauma (Wu et al 2016). Cerebral metabolites are believed to correlate with cerebral cellular changes and/or injury.…”
Section: Spectroscopy (H 1 -Mrs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cerebral metabolites are believed to correlate with cerebral cellular changes and/or injury. Reproducibility of H 1 -MRS is high (Busch et al 2015;McGuire et al 2017b;Wijtenburg et al 2019).…”
Section: Spectroscopy (H 1 -Mrs)mentioning
confidence: 99%